Sunday, 31 May 2015

Canadian MGTOW Flying Circus: Potato Beatdown !

Canadian MGTOW Flying Circus: Potato Beatdown !

Be the victim wished he asked for just potato chips
Be the victim wished he asked for just potato chips



Welcome to another "Canadian MGTOW Flying Circus" Video.  A series in which I will look at the lighter side of life.

Today's episode  is called, "Potato Beatdown. "

Rachel Salters, 46, was arrested  on charges of child abuse and tampering with evidence.

Apparently a verbal argument started after the victim, a 12 year old boy, asked her to make him some dinner. Things escalated when Rachel picked up a full bag of potatoes and began swinging it at the boy.  The boy ran to the bathroom, locked the door and hid behind the toilet.

Undeterred, Rachel kicked down the bathroom door, and began hitting the boy in the head with the bag of potatoes. Eventually the bag broke open, and she resorted to throwing potatoes at the boy.

During the investigation, Rachel told police that she didn't know why the bathroom door frame was broken or how the potato got in the bathroom. She was later charged with tampering, after removing a potato marked as evidence, from the bathroom.  Her response to the deputy was that she just wanted to clean up the bathroom.

Sure, Rachel. Sure.

I will conclude this video with a potato joke.

What's red, sits in the corner and gets smaller and smaller?

A baby combing it's head with a potato peeler!

Monday, 18 May 2015

Friday, 15 May 2015

FHRITP and Mainstream media not doing its job.


 FHRITP and Mainstream media not doing its job.



This is Canadian MGTOW.  Having fun, and not giving a shit...

Today's video is called,  #FHRITP.

By now you have probably heard of the  social media firestorm touched off by a female TV reporter in Toronto, who fought back  against fans who were copycatting a video meme, in which they interrupted her reporting  to say, "F*** her right in the pussy!"

Go to any YouTube video about this event, and you will see the feminists out in droves, commenting on how terrible this was.  They have nothing left to complain about nowadays but first world problems.  Whether it be a man sitting on a bus with his legs spread apart, or growing a damn beard during Movember, it is all considered micro-aggressions, or some sort of assertion of male power.  Rants of misogyny and "white privilege" are thrown around, as they publicly cheer how one of the men, who didn't even say the phrase, lost his job because of it.

It just shows how privileged women are in our Canadian society.  Does anyone honestly think that if the reporter was male and a female interjected live TV with a vulgar remark that she would of been fired?  Why is it that women are basically allowed to tell men what they can and cannot say to them, but I never see the opposite allowed.  Try telling a woman what she should and should not say, and you'll be called a control freak.

Commenter's on my videos sometimes criticize me for not putting my picture up, or using a computer voice.  Can you blame me in such a hyper-sensitive country?  Once you trigger these Nazis with something you say, they will stop at nothing to find out who you are, dox you, and get you fired.  People that are real adults can calmly and rationally have a difference of opinion.  Picture two women telling each other a joke, one gets offended, storms off, and phones the boss of the other woman, and tells them she should be fired.  Sounds pretty ridiculous once the players in this mini-drama are both women, doesn't it?  Now add some drunk male soccer fan and a female reporter, and it's a national event.  If we are all equal as feminism proclaims, how is one situation more disastrous than the other?

I think that our society has made being offended into a position of power, where if you are offended by something then you are automatically granted control of the situation or dialogue, regardless if there was a genuine cause for offense or not. People then have to listen to you, and respect your wishes, until you are no longer offended. So I think a lot of people see it in their best interests to remain as offended as they possibly can, over as many different issues as possible, for as long as possible. So in short, I think some people are decrying the fact that these guys lost their jobs over a catchphrase because they see it as another extension of this offended-by-everything feminist victim culture that we've become. This is what modern feminism is reduced to. There's no context to this joke, it's directed at no one, and yet it's such a huge deal. Meanwhile women in other countries are stoned to death if they show their face in public.

Beyond all of the pretentious bullshit, let's not pretend this guy really deserved to have his life seriously impeded by a moment of completely harmless juvenile behavior. Companies fire people like this not for some highly justified moral reasoning, but because they are the ultimate in conformist group-think.  They cannot even dare to appear to not swallow whichever politically correct strain of cow-shit that is the current fad of society. In the case of Hydro One it is government owned, so it produces and  eats politically correct shit.  Hook, line, and sinker.

I have great disdain for our mainstream media.  The national broadcaster, CBC, had three separate stories about it in one day on their website. Absolutely no investigative reporting on their part. What's to investigate you ask? I think the that the reporter knew exactly what she was doing.

If you carefully watch the video of the event, you will see how misleading it is. She deliberately provoked two male bystanders, after the guy who actually made the remark on live TV, had already left. The reporter turned the situation to her advantage.  She has probably heard of the phrase "don't feed the trolls", and decided to give these guys a chance to "double-down" with more vulgar braggadocio. And they did. They just reacted egoistically. This was the textbook definition of troll feeding.

Some people on youTube called her brave, but I cannot think of a more safe situation for a female, than to have a male cameraman at her side, filming everything and anything that is done or said.

 Because she got all emotional and threw professionalism out the window, it guaranteed that this video would go viral. All cheap popularity! The owner of the TV station is happy, and some female reporter who was covering Toronto's losing soccer team is now a household name. The only thing that was missing was the Victorian fainting couch.  She's interviewing drunk people next to a stadium after a soccer game, in which their team lost, and yet she is demanding respect.  Female privilege, much?

I would have stood up and challenged the reporter in a calm, respectful manner rather than be supportive to the other dude.  I would have said something  empathetic to Shauna, the female reporter,  for the rudeness by the other guy, but I would of emphasized the point that, "They were probably raised by single mothers as well. Today's women are not doing a good job at all!"  Guaranteed that the footage would never see the light of day.  Criticizing mothers is still taboo, on what I call not mainstream media, but "woman-stream media."

I recall journalists being murdered for drawing offensive religious cartoons and they became heroes. Now this man is being dragged through the mud by the same type of people who claim to defend freedom of speech!  Shauna explained her side on the station's morning show and they showed an edited version without the person who said  F-H-R-I-T-P.   City News shouldn't be biased and focus more on the facts and not be influenced by their staff.  But news is political.  I scanned their website for their coverage of my provincial government's new gender-biased sexual violence campaign. Not a single criticism of the campaign.  Not even a criticism of the 41,000,000 dollar cost of the program, in a province whose debt is WORSE than California's.

I don't trust mainstream media. I also don't trust the female reporter in the video.  It is the job of media to keep governments accountable, and to educate, not indoctrinate.  I would add, News flash!  Sexual harassment and rape happen to men as well, and are severely under-reported (because society laughs at the men who come out).  These same reporters act like paparazzi at accidents and other catastrophes when they approach people. Where's that story?  I personally hope that F-H-R-I-T-P continues, on the basis that it's all about making a mockery of the media who lie to us every damn day.

This concludes this article... If you enjoyed this video, please comment, rate and subscribe.  Thank you. This is Canadian MGTOW, signing off! Save yourself! Go MGTOW...

Tuesday, 12 May 2015

Why does Kathleen Wynne hate me and my sons

Why does Kathleen Wynne hate me and my sons

Kathleen Wynne either hates me and my sons, or she's stupid.
Kathleen Wynne either hates me and my sons, or she's stupid.



Today's video is called, "Why does Kathleen Wynne hate me and my sons?"

For those not familiar with Ontario, Canada, we are one of the 10 provinces that make up Canada. Over 38% of the population lives in Ontario, with about 6 million in the Toronto area.  The premier of our province is Kathleen Wynne. If we were in the US, she would be the equivalent of a governor.  Ontario, in my opinion, is the politically correct, and most feminist area of Canada. Heck, our premier is even a lesbian.  Now, on a nearly daily basis I am reminded that my premier hates me for being a white cis male.

In this segment I will show that Kathleen Wynne either hates me, or is simply stupid.  I will let the viewers decide.

In an effort to tackle sexual violence, the government is using $41,000,000 for a public education campaign, with ads that directly calls on bystanders to intervene.  I guess Kathleen the feminist is all for ending gender roles, so long as we keep the role of men as protectors.  Well, screw you Kathleen.  In the commercials there are 3 or 4 situations depicted and in all cases the bad guy is male.

And it doesn't just end there.  Stronger workplace safety legislation requiring employers to investigate workplace harassment. There will also be legislation to eliminate the two-year limitation period for civil sexual assault claims.  Along with the legislation is something they call an “enhanced prosecution model” tailored to sexual assault cases.  Who knows. Maybe they will follow the US college system of declaring guilt with no due process.

When the Canadian Association for Equality asked why Kathleen Wynne's narrative is that men are uniformly the violent and evil aggressor, the response was a misquoted Statistics Canada stat. Kathleen says that 90% of sexual violence victims are women, but the statistic is that 90% of women that are sexually assaulted are assaulted by men.  Even with this misquoted statistic, the ads are totally ignoring the fact, by Wynne's own flawed data, that 10% of female sexual assault is at the hands of a female.  Is this just plain stupidity, or is there a feminist agenda at play? 

In a video put out by the Canadian Association for Equality, I found a comment that captures how flawed this $41,000,000 program is.  It is provided here, courtesy of You-Tuber Theron Meyer, in a letter he addressed to Kathleen Wynne:

Hello Kathleen

I recently came across the promotional video for the #WhoWillYouHelp campaign funded by the Ontario government. What I saw was troubling. . .

My biggest problem with this campaign is that it sets up a 'gender war' narrative where men are uniformly the violent and evil aggressor and women are the innocent and victimized damsels - neither a positive nor realistic picture of either gender.

As more comprehensive and unbiased research arises, so does a growing body of evidence that men are on the victim side of the equation much more often than feminists seem to claim. When CAFE asked you about the research behind the justification for the stance of your campaign, you misquoted a STATSCAN statistic by saying that 90% of sexual violence victims are women, when in fact the statistic is that in 90% of the cases where women are sexually victimized, the perpetrators are male. Those two statements say completely different things, but your actions really exemplify how one must bend and twist evidence and reality to create the gender narrative played out by your campaign. But let's look at the facts:

According to the 2010 National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, equal number of men and women were raped in the 12 months prior to the survey. However, it is not displayed as such because female-on-male rape, i.e. forced envelopment or being 'made to penetrate', was not categorized as rape.

A study that was published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine in 2005, found that more boys (6.7%) than girls (5.4%) experienced completed rape.

According to a paper published in the American Psychological Association journal, 43% of high school and college-aged men say they’ve had “unwanted sexual contact,” and 95% of those say a female acquaintance was the aggressor.

As quoted from "Women's sexual aggression against men: prevalence and predictors":

"In a sample of 212 female participants studied by Anderson and Aymami (1993), 28.5% reported the use of verbal coercion, 14.7% had coerced a man into sexual activity by getting him intoxicated, and 7.1% had threatened or used physical force. Higher prevalence rates were established in a subsequent study by Anderson (1998) in which the same instrument was used. Prevalence of verbal coercion was as high as 43%, and 36.5% of respondents reported having gotten a man intoxicated to make him engage in sexual acts. Threat of force was reported by 27.8%, use of force by 20%, and threatening a man with a weapon by 8.9% of the female participants."

Putting men and women neatly in these categories hurts them both. Evidence contrary to the narrative of aggressor=male and victim=female, is ignored, suppressed and censored, which leaves the truth of male victimhood in the dark and the notion of male predation inflated. The exaggeration of female victimhood, using this simplistic and monolithic narrative, imparts the notion that women have no agency in the matter, that they incapable and in need of everybody's help. Instead of bestowing on women and girls a since of agency, capability and self-determination, you choose to cast them in the disempowering and infantilizing victim role. In this role, a woman is apparently so incapable, that simply telling a man to stop touching her shoulders or to report it to HR herself, is simply out of the question. No, everyone in the office must gang together and do it for her.

And there are so many reasons not to get incapacitated drunk in a public setting (for both men and women) - getting into fist fights, having your things stolen, getting behind the wheel, and being taken advantage of - but instead of telling women to be responsible adults, you tell the rest of the world to take care of them like they're incompetent babies.

The message that the  #WhoWillYouHelp  campaign sends is problematic in so many ways, and I hope you reconsider your framework.


Theron Meyer

I urge everyone, including people that do not even live in Ontario, to email a copy of this letter to the premier's email address.    The letter and email address are provided in the description box below this video. It will also be available on my blog.  If you are uneasy of sharing your email address with a government entity, then please share this video or the  blog post to spread this information far and wide. 

Email your feedback to

Message through online Form: 

If you have a twitter account, feel free to voice your displeasure using the Hash-tag, #WhoWillYouHelp

To contact the Ontario Legislature at Queen's Park, call 416-325-7500. For Kathleen Wynne call 416-325-1941.

Kathleen Wynne, Premier
Legislative Building
Queen's Park
Toronto ON M7A 1A1